Hello classmates,
Neurobiophysiology verses psychotherapy, which field of
study is more dominant in the field of psychology?
Ultimately
my goal was to learn more about each field so that I could narrow down the path
that I want to follow in my new career.
There are so many interesting aspects of psychology and many directions
to take that even narrowing it down to the two branches was not easy, I wanted
my research question to be more like “Neurobiopsysiology vs. psychotherapy vs.
Interactive Therapy vs. Clinical vs. Forensic Psychology” but I didn’t think
that I would be able to conduct all of the research necessary during the
timeframe of this class (and I don’t think that Professor Macomber would have
approved my question).
In
order to answer my question, I wanted to learn about the current studies that
were being conducted, and understand the depth that each discipline
follows. The deeper I read and
researched, the more amazing material I found, I could do this for a year and
not run out of material, but I did have to stop at some point.
My
search paths have a definite improvement from the way I started this class, I
always thought that Google knew what I was talking about, so I would type my
question and hope for the best. Now I
understand Boolean searches, using AND, and also quotation marks, plus I love
the limitations I can add to my search such as “time frame” and “full-text only
and “full download available” Knowing
this way to search has changed my world.
For this assignment I added my first key word, then changed my AND word,
even added and additional AND word, I had to change my first word and then
results were fantastic. Even though
neurobiophysiology is a real word, it’s fairly new to the industry and didn’t
come up in searches. From my first
search in the beginning of this class of: “Oh my gosh, what the heck is this
stuff? To my last search when I wanted to read every article that I found, I am
a changed person thanks to this class. I
hit the jackpot when I found the last book:
Pioneering
Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience.
The
sources that I used are all credible because I used the CRAAP test (I still
can’t say that without giggling). I made
sure that my information was current, it was related to my topic, the sources
had qualified credentials, there was evidence to back-up the information and
there were not any political or religious affiliations to my knowledge.
I
was able to learn about the technological advances, studies that are being
conducted today by some of the brilliant minds in the field. Knowing what is current will allow me to
(outside of this class) search, based on what I learned here, for research
labs, and institutions in my area that are hiring for the work that I am most
interested in.
With the understanding that
the field of psychology changes with our culture, there will always be
different things to study. For example, learning
about the effects of videos games in today’s youth was not a question on
anyone’s mind in the 1960’s. Also, today
we know so much more about the brain, so the expansion of experiments and field
studies increases exponentially. References
Books:
Villalba, E., & Costa,
A. (2013). Horizons in Neuroscience Research. New York: Nova Science
Publishers. Roche, R. P., &
Commins, S. (2009). Pioneering Studies in Cognitive
Neuroscience. Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
Online Resources:
OGDEN PHD, J. So You Want to Be a Neuropsychologist? In-text: (Ogden PhD)
Bibliography: Ogden PhD, Jenni. 'So You Want To Be A Neuropsychologist?'. Psychology
Today. N.p., 2015. Web. 17 June 2015.
BUCKS, R. S., OLAITHE, M.
and EASTWOOD, P. (2013), Neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnoea: A
meta-review. Respirology, 18: 61–70.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02255.x
Peer Reviewed/Academic Journals:
Marlatt, L. (2014). THE
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY BEHIND CHOICE THEORY: FIVE BASIC NEEDS. International
Journal Of Choice Theory & Reality Therapy,34(1), 16-21.
Scarpazza, C., Braghittoni,
D., Casale, B., Malagú, S., Mattioli, F., di Pellegrino, G., & Ladavas, E.
(2013). Education protects against cognitive changes associated with multiple
sclerosis. Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience, 31(5), 619-631.
doi:10.3233/RNN-120261
No comments:
Post a Comment